White House Stands Firm: Pronouns in Emails Signal Delusion, Not Journalism

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has taken a stand against the creeping insanity of the radical left, refusing to entertain so-called "journalists" who plaster their email signatures with "preferred pronouns." Speaking to the floundering, far-left Washington Post—a rag teetering on the edge of bankruptcy—Leavitt didn’t mince words: “Any reporter who chooses to put their preferred pronouns in their bio clearly does not care about biological reality or truth and therefore cannot be trusted to write an honest story.”

Amen to that! Finally, a voice of reason in a world gone mad. Leavitt’s stance is a clarion call to every God-fearing, freedom-loving American who’s sick of the woke mind virus infecting our institutions. And the left-wing media, predictably, is clutching its pearls. The Post whined that the New York Times—another bastion of progressive drivel—reported three of its reporters were denied responses from the White House for daring to list pronouns in their emails. Even Matt Berg, a hack from the laughably named "Crooked Media," admitted he tried slipping his pronouns into an email as a little experiment, only to get shut down by a Trump administration spokesperson. Good. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

The Post, in its desperate attempt to defend this lunacy, claimed that including pronouns in emails and introductions has become “normalized” across industries to “show support with the transgender or nonbinary community and prevent misgendering.” Normalized? Maybe in the fever swamps of liberal newsrooms or the godless halls of academia, but not in the real world where men are men, women are women, and truth still matters. Misgendering? Give me a break. The only thing being misgendered here is reality itself, twisted into a pretzel by fetishists and crybabies who think their feelings override God’s design.

Leavitt’s right: if you’re obsessed with pronouns, you’re not a journalist—you’re a propagandist. The Bible tells us in Genesis 1:27, “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.” Not “male, female, and 57 genders in between.” Male and female—period. Science backs this up: XX and XY chromosomes don’t lie, no matter how much the rainbow-haired brigade screams about “spectrums.” Even those rare genetic anomalies the left loves to trot out? Still biologically male or female. Case closed.

This pronoun nonsense isn’t just anti-science—it’s anti-God. It’s a power play by arrogant elitists who demand we bow to their delusions, rewriting language and biology to coddle their egos. As the Post itself admitted, it’s about “showing support” for a tiny, loud minority while trampling the rest of us underfoot. Cry-bullying at its finest. Well, sorry, snowflakes—out here in flyover country, we’re not buying it. My pronouns? How about “Christian” and “patriot”? Or better yet, “Trump” and “won,” because that’s what’s coming in 2025.

The Washington Post can clutch its soy lattes and wail all it wants, but Leavitt’s stance is a victory for truth, faith, and common sense. Journalists should report facts, not force their fantasies on the rest of us. If you can’t handle reality, maybe it’s time to trade that press badge for a therapy couch. The White House isn’t here to play your pronoun games—and neither are we. Praise God for leaders who still know the difference between right and wrong, male and female, truth and lies. Let’s keep fighting the good fight.