Washington, D.C. — President-elect Donald Trump confirmed his administration’s intention to declare a national emergency to address illegal immigration and secure the southern border upon taking office in January. Trump’s decisive move was announced via Truth Social, where he affirmed reports of plans to utilize military assets for a large-scale deportation program.
The statement came in response to Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton, who highlighted the incoming administration’s resolve to reverse what he termed “the Biden invasion.” Trump responded emphatically, writing “TRUE!!!” to Fitton’s post, signaling his commitment to making immigration reform a centerpiece of his presidency.
Trump’s proposed use of military resources to enforce immigration laws is expected to be a cornerstone of his plan to restore order at the southern border. The initiative represents a dramatic escalation in the fight against illegal migration, which Trump and his supporters argue has reached crisis levels under the Biden administration.
“GOOD NEWS: Reports are the incoming @RealDonaldTrump administration [is] prepared to declare a national emergency and will use military assets to reverse the Biden invasion through a mass deportation program,” Fitton wrote. Trump’s one-word confirmation further underscores the seriousness of his commitment to tackling what he has consistently called an "invasion" of the United States..
Immigration was a defining issue in the 2024 campaign, with Trump promising to rebuild border security infrastructure dismantled under President Biden and restore policies like “Remain in Mexico.” The Biden administration oversaw record-breaking numbers of illegal crossings, with critics blaming lax enforcement policies for the surge. Trump’s return to the White House promises a stark contrast, featuring robust enforcement measures and a zero-tolerance approach.
During the campaign, Trump pledged to reinstate policies that worked during his first term, such as expanding the border wall and enhancing collaboration with state and local law enforcement to apprehend and deport illegal migrants. His latest announcement signals that he is willing to go further, leveraging emergency powers to ensure swift and decisive action.
Conservative leaders and border security advocates have hailed Trump’s plan as a long-overdue response to the crisis.
Critics of the Biden administration’s border policies argue that lax enforcement has overwhelmed communities, strained social services, and compromised national security. Trump’s announcement appears aimed at reassuring Americans that the federal government will once again prioritize sovereignty and the rule of law.
Trump’s plan is not without controversy. Legal experts and immigration activists have already begun raising questions about the use of military force for domestic law enforcement, citing potential conflicts with federal statutes such as the Posse Comitatus Act. However, Trump’s legal team has previously navigated similar challenges, and the national emergency declaration would likely provide a pathway to circumvent those restrictions.
Politically, Trump’s announcement is expected to galvanize his base while reigniting fierce debates over immigration policy. Opponents, including Democratic leaders, have criticized the proposal as draconian and unworkable, setting the stage for potential legal battles and congressional clashes.
Trump’s reaffirmation of his immigration agenda demonstrates his broader commitment to the “America First” principles that defined his first term. By prioritizing border security and confronting illegal immigration head-on, the incoming administration is sending a clear signal that it intends to restore control and accountability to the nation’s immigration system.
As Trump prepares to take office, his decisive stance on the border crisis underscores his readiness to tackle the issues that matter most to his supporters. With a new mandate from the American people, he is poised to deliver on his promise to restore order at the southern border and ensure the safety and sovereignty of the United States.
Comments